Welcome to Northern California Forensic Psychological Services

Simon M. McCrea, PhD

Clinical Psychologist California #29801

  Location #1: 798 Lighthouse Drive #246

                     Monterey, California

                      USA 93940

  Location #2: 15 - 2512 Louise Street 

                       Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

                       Canada S7J0P3

                       Email: simon.mccrea@protonmail.com

I am a fully licensed clinical psychologist in the State of California #29801 and I have worked with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) as a prison psychologist, with Social Security Administration (SSA) as a disability psychologist and Executive Mental Health as a clinical neuropsychologist from 2018-2022. 

The California Board of Psychology issued a Certification of Licensure on May 12, 2025. These certificates are often used by applicants to determine equivalency across jurisdictions in Canada and the United States for mobility of credentials for professionals.

I am interested in Ethics and Clinical Psychology and have written several published articles in this area. 

In clinical psychology serious ethics offenses can involve fraudulent signing of forms (e.g., forging a death certificate), breaking of client confidentiality for personal gain, insurance scams, improper breaking into a psychologist's office and vandalism of computers, intimidation and threats from authority figures, observation of sex-offenders loafing near a Children's Centre supposedly under the care of a clinical psychologist, faked near fatal high-speed car crashes with children inside, collusion in fake reports where a patient may have never been seen by a clinician and yet a report [miraculously] exists. These are all extreme examples of unethical behavior by clinical psychologists. In most jurisdictions within Canada and the United States such behavior would be dealt with by severe criminal and civil penalties. 

If any clinical psychology staff turn a blind eye to such criminal behavior the best available advice from the Canadian Psychological Association and American Psychological Association and NIH/NIMH guidelines are to REPORT ANYWAY  and do not listen to the unethical psychologists. Clinical Psychologists must never be penalized for making a report that is based upon facts and is accurate, verified and truthful and made in good faith. 

Ethics Vignettes

Here are a sampling of Ethical Vignettes. These are of a substantially more serious nature than that usually depicted in the Canadian Code of Ethics for Psychologists. An extended and elaborated manuscript on ethics and clinical psychology has been accepted for publication by an Australian peer-reviewed journal on biomedical and psychology ethics. Feel free to download. The last download count for the Ethics Vignettes is 22,018 as of June 23, 2025 so it should have circulated around to many international accredited internship sites.

Writing ethics papers is a good way to be a progressive advocate for change and ethics boards will often request complainant clinical psychologists write the sequence of events for legal documentation purposes. However publishing ethics papers without a functioning moral compass can be a liability for academic clinical psychologists. The vignettes are listed below.

e0bda6ad-8f46-40fc-bac6-0f9f32033750

Academics and Cowardice

A female child aged 3 was assaulted by swarthy goons at Garneau Elementary School in Edmonton, Alberta. Her hymen in her pelvis was torn and she was bleeding. She was picked up by her father. It is not clear if she was both vaginally and anally penetrated. She was vaginally assaulted for sure (e.g., see page 2025b). There were no other medical findings. The pattern suggests aggression displayed by the perpetrator towards a three-year-old girl. 

There were various complaints on the University of Alberta campus at that time about an unusual cult which was very widely known. Several doctoral and post-doctoral students were actually warned about this and had a hand sign for this.  Penalties for this type of sexual assault on young children are usually 5-10 years in prison for teachers. Teachers generally do not do well in prison for a number of reasons and they sure do not like standardized testing.

Now there are contractors that will rape children and some organizations actually have this trash on staff. There have been studies on this unique phenomenon in Education where teachers in some jursidictions rarely do any time for such crimes and it seems to be a uniquely Canadian phenomenon. I can think of at least two dozen [non-published] studies on this topic in this area. For instance an old and "shifty" clinical neuropsychologist (M.V.) at Royal University Hospital (under the Lorne Calvert - [clergyman]) did in fact show contempt for a court of law and deliberately ignored the findings that a father's 3 year old child was sexually assaulted by teachers (e.g., please answer to exhibits A, B and C). This is serious fraud deliberately perpetrated by the clinical neuropsychologist (MV). 

It is not uncommon for University Faculty under these circumstances to be promptly asked to leave an academic institution. Lawyers and clinical psychologists recommend that fathers with daughters must be extremely wary of female psychologists with ideologically driven beliefs and not following the law or ethics codes. Uncritical trusting such clinical neuropsychologists can result in major losses such as  loss of home, car, employment, and finally spouse and children. "Its just delicious food." There are lawyers  for fathers and daughters rights and they will provide excellent and candid advice on shopping and selecting for a reputable clinical psychologist to work for the client.   

I guess as an act for clarification one could contact their supposed clinical psychology colleagues. Drs. Kleisinger, Drs. Asmundson, Drs. T. and H. Hadjistravolpoulos did not care at all about this story. Because they are interested in grants at the Department of Psychology. The Department of Psychology at the University of Regina has a distinct far left-leaning socialist-unionist bias. In fact they appeared to have purposely denied the story initially. Studies show that people from these types of political psychology backgrounds will almost reflexively protect such unsavory interests no matter what. The focus in on the greater glory of the monolithic State and not individual rights and due process.  

Clinical psychologists must always be mindful and  aware that they should have a vested interest in always looking after vulnerable populations like children or the elderly.

How did a fraudulently filed report mimicking the Edmonton false allegations (e.g. a Edmonton custody evaluation which was favorable to both parents) get to Saskatoon? Because the father wasn't actually living in the City of Saskatoon at that time!  There was nothing pejorative written about the childs fathers' character in any documentation. Same with the three pornography allegations at three separate locations in Regina from 2018-2022 upon return from the United States.  The trouble is the father was 2000 miles away and so that is a major logical problem. Law is based on facts and logical reasoning and sequencing of events and not nuances and subjective unsubstantiated reports.  Suing or cajoling will not work either. Because the story is true  and thus would not be subject to the laws of slander, defamation and libel.

Given the sequence of the child's assault, the other side's narrative was very weak and in fact this matter was dismissed as non-credible and a "complete fabrication" in Edmonton.   

Clinical Psychologists from an academic or private practice must never accept grant monies (e.g., external/internal) from any company/organization that would encourage deliberate alienation of a child from their parents.  That is the assessment, evaluation and treatment would be contingent upon receipt of cash (e.g., in fact this is highly unethical and major fraud if you consider the average clinical neuropsychologist charges about $10,000 per evaluation). Very few reputable health insurance companies would act in this way and this is hugely unethical and beyond cruel. This type of behavior by clinical psychologists is a very serious professional, ethical and moral misconduct and in almost all jurisdictions in North America would result in  permanent license revocation. 

In closing how exactly did the City of Saskatoon get involved in this? Maybe the faculty at the University of Saskatchewan or University of Regina wanted to obtain a grant by currying favor with the University of Alberta which was flush with cash at that time. Remember the father was not in Saskatoon. The father was not in the City of Saskatoon. The father was found by a court to be not guilty of any charges in Edmonton. 

I think that personnel were eager for a conviction in Saskatoon based on a compilation of Penthouse, Oui or Playboy. Looking after their brother's in Edmonton I guess. However it is best not to asphyxiate an innocent man.  

Today it is the year 2025 and NOT the year 2000. 

These events took place over 25 years ago! Father's whose spouses are gravely ill with life-threatening leukemia tend to (almost without exception) watch erotica because their spouse is sick and often she may not be able to engage safely in sexual intercourse. Erotica is used in many medical and clinical psychological settings for the treatment of patients that are ostensibly normal and without character flaws.  As clinicians we have to remember that many geographical locations are prudish and judgemental and see any expressions of sexuality very punitively and aggressively which is a terrible [shame]. 

Please note that under both Canadian and American law clinical psychologists submitting such serious reports of unethical conduct by one or more colleagues cannot be: blacklisted, discriminated against, be denied employment, sanctioned, censured, be denied review for tenure, unjustly or arbitrarily terminated, denied the privilege of holding grants. Or have their health and life's chances seriously jeopardized by malevolent and completely falsified verbal or written statements by unethical clinical psychologists. 

If you have any questions about the Ethics Vignettes please do not hesitate to contact me at simon.mccrea@protonmail.com. I will have a set of electronic well-designed learning modules available for the Ethical Vignettes that you will be provided a login password for and link.  

A word of caution: It is widely known that perpetrators that would harm a three-year-old child in such a manner as just described could be very dangerous. It would not be uncommon for family members of a clinical psychologist be targeted with intimidation and violence under such circumstances. And this often happens.  

I guess you would have to ask a physician like  Dr. Richard E. Walker, MD (Radiologist) with Mayfair Diagnostics in Calgary Alberta. Did you live with this roommate for 2 1/2 years while studying at the College of Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan? Was the man sexually interested in adult women and were these interests sexually appropriate? How often did you engage in social activities together while living with this man in the City of Saskatoon for 2 1/2 years. How much money do you make? Did you complete a psychiatry rotation? Where? How much education do you have? Do you use Siemen's MRI scanners at your place of business? How much do these cost? Have you ever completed radiological evaluations for neurologists, neuroradiologists or clinical neuropsychologists? Are you aware that the developmental history for these types of disorders is highly discordant and that no reputable clinician I spoke with believed a word of it. Total garbage in their view. Several  clinical psychologists have been shown to be lying along with emergency medical services with fabricated stuffed files replete with bribes. Rick was always a strong believer in a two-tiered medicare system for Canadians.

I would like to thank the many anonymous informants in Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Regina, Vancouver, Philadelphia and Sacramento. Have a great holiday.